по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Publication in 72 hours: How do we do it? > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial board
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Philosophical Thought
Reference:

To the question on the novelty and heuristic potential of doxology in Protagorean version of modern gnoseology
Vorobev Dmitrii Nikolaevich

PhD in Philosophy

Docent, the department of Pedagogy, Psychology and Philosophy, Yakovlev Chuvash State Pedagogical University

428000, Russia, respublika Chuvashiya, g. Cheboksary, ul. K. Marksa, 38, kab. 219

vorobjov.d@gmail.com
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

Abstract.

This article is dedicated to the determination of novelty and heuristic potential of doxology as a Protagorean version of constructivist epistemology. Analyzing the problem of epistemological relativism on the context of antagonism between the supporters of epistemological realism and constructivism, the author outlines the problematic field, on the background of which the novelty and heuristic potential become evident. In the course of this research were used the method of interpretation and critical method of philosophy, supported by the principles of historicism, unambiguity, and systemic consideration. The novelty of doxology consists in the expanded interpretation of the structure of cognition, which central elements are the realistic rendering of a cognitive subject and the idea of functional circle of cognitive activity (logos) and its object (doxa). The heuristic potential of doxology consist in its contribution to solution of the problem of relativism: focusing on the methods and factors of producing by the subject of what is considered real, intersubjective in certain area or culture at the moment, doxology contributed to formulation of methodology for understanding the consistent and intersubjective character of the relativity of knowledge.

Keywords: homo mensura principle, epistemological realism, epistemological constructivism, naturalizing epistemology, doxology, social epistemology, rhetorical philosophy, relativism, doxa, relationism

DOI:

10.25136/2409-8728.2018.12.28540

Article was received:

28-12-2018


Review date:

29-12-2018


Publish date:

31-12-2018


This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Vorob'ev, D. N. Genealogiya istiny. K voprosu o sotsial'noi legitimatsii epistemologicheskogo realizma // Filosofskaya mysl'. 2018. №8. S. 21–33.
2.
Vorob'ev, D. N. Doksologiya Matsa Rozengrena kak proekt ritoricheskoi filosofii poznaniya: kontekst i kontseptual'nye osnovaniya // Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya. 2014. № 3. URL: http://www.science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=13732 (data obrashcheniya: 24.11.2018).
3.
Vorob'ev, D. N. Osnovnye idei i kontseptual'nye predposylki doksologii Matsa Rozengrena // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2018. № 11. S. 38–58. DOI: 10.7256/2454-0757.2018.11.28198. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/pfk/article_28198.html
4.
Vorob'ev, D. N. Sokrat kak prorok. Arkhaicheskie cherty ksenofonto-platonovskogo obraza Sokrata // Filosofskaya mysl'. 2017. № 11. S. 47–58. DOI: 10.25136/2409-8728.2017.11.20933. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/fr/article_20933.html
5.
Kasavin, I. T. Relyativizm kak posledovatel'nyi ratsionalizm // Epistemologiya segodnya. Idei, problemy, diskussii : koll. monogr. / pod red. I. T. Kasavina i N. N. Voroninoi. N. Novgorod: Izd-vo Nizhegorodskogo gosuniversiteta im. N. I. Lobachevskogo, 2018. S. 241–246.
6.
Kasavin, I. T. Sotsial'naya filosofiya nauki i kollektivnaya epistemologiya. M.: Ves' mir, 2016. 264 s.
7.
Mangeim, K. Ocherki sotsiologii znaniya. Teoriya poznaniya – mirovozzrenie – istorizm / sost., per. i predisl. E. Ya. Dodina. M.: INION, 1998. 249 s.
8.
Mikeshina, L. A. Relyativizm kak epistemologicheskaya problema // Epistemologiya segodnya. Idei, problemy, diskussii : koll. monogr. / pod red. I. T. Kasavina i N. N. Voroninoi. – N. Novgorod: Izd-vo Nizhegorodskogo gosuniversiteta im. N. I. Lobachevskogo, 2018. S. 201–212
9.
Rozengren, M. K voprosu o doxa: epistemologiya “novoi ritoriki” // Voprosy filosofii. 2012. № 6. C. 63–72.
10.
Rozengren, M. Tezis Protagora: doksologicheskii podkhod // Voprosy filosofii. 2014. № 5. C. 171–178.
11.
Rozengren, M. Chelovek kak mera. Beseda s Matsom Rozengrenom o kontekste vozniknoveniya doksologii // Filosofskaya mysl'. 2018. № 10. S. 32–42. DOI: 10.25136/2409-8728.2018.10.27554. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/fr/article_27554.html
12.
Trufanova, E. O. Sub''ekt i poznanie v mire sotsial'nykh konstruktsii. M.: Kanon+ ROOI «Reabilitatsiya», 2018. 320 s.
13.
Khaking, Ya. Predstavlenie i vmeshatel'stvo. Nachal'nye voprosy filosofii estestvennykh nauk / per. s angl. S. Kuznetsova, nauch. red. E. A. Mamchur. M.: Logos 1998. 296 s.
14.
Boghossian, P. Fear of Knowledge. Against Relativism and Constructivism. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2006.
15.
Harre, R. Foreword // Social Constructionism, Discourse and Realism / Ian Parker (ed.). London: Sage Publications, 1998. P. XI.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website